Filler photography that shows projection, not just symmetry

Lips, cheeks, chin, and jawline results read from the side and three-quarter views. Capture them consistently or lose them entirely.

Get started

Trusted by thousands of practices that turn real results into revenue.

Why filler results demand a different capture approach

The side views where filler results live

Lateral and oblique capture guides document the projection changes that frontal photos flatten away.
Lip, cheek, chin, and jawline sequences each frame their target zone so subtle volume reads clearly.
Consistent head positioning across visits means a profile comparison shows the filler, not a tilted chin.

Document the full settling timeline

Capture immediately post-treatment, then again after swelling resolves, so patients understand what is product and what is puffiness.
Session-over-session records show cumulative building across a multi-syringe treatment plan.
A clear visual timeline heads off the two-day panic call before it happens.

Consults that plan placement visually

Draw proposed placement and expected contour changes directly on the patient's own photo during the consultation.
Galleries of your settled, consented results show prospects what natural-looking filler from your hands actually means.
Side-by-side and slider views give patients realistic expectations before the first syringe is opened.

Filler documentation, before and after a real system

Swelling, angles, and lighting can fake or hide a filler result. A capture protocol rules all three out.

Photos vary by provider, angle, and lighting

Images scattered across phones and personal devices

No consistent workflow for before-and-after capture

Before-and-after comparisons are weak or unconvincing

Patient records, photos, and consent forms live in separate places

Every photo follows the same guided capture protocol

All images stored in one HIPAA-compliant cloud system

Procedure-specific sequences standardize capture for any treatment

Ghosting overlays make before-and-after comparisons precise and credible

Photos, consent forms, and clinical notes link together in one patient record

Practices documenting filler with RxPhoto

The amount of time I save using RxPhoto compared to Mirror is substantial: close to 15 hours per month. I also appreciate having access to before and after photos at my fingertips, in every exam room. Overall patient satisfaction is higher for injectables, because I do my 'after' photos immediately after injecting.

Lindsay Van Meter

Plastic Surgery Practice

I like knowing our photos are secured from a state and federal standpoint. Without RxPhoto, it becomes a DIY process that becomes terribly time consuming.

Jeff Birchall

Carlsbad, CA